As former Senator George Allen taught us, when you’re on the campaign trail, you should be mindful and respectful of people who are attending your public events, even when they are there to document your speeches on videotape and even if they may not support you.

Campaigns should also make a concerted effort to tell supporters to be mindful and respectful of everyone in the audience. In Allen’s case, no one pushed or shoved the young man who was recording; Allen himself attempted to publicly humiliate the young man, an Indian-American, by referring to him as “macaca,” an obvious ethnic slur.

Campaign events are typically free and open to the public. They typically encourage people to bring video and photographic cameras; they want people to document the event. It has become an important component of the campaign process: documentation, uploading campaign photos onto the Internet, viral videos.

And because campaign events are often free and open to the public, they are also free and open to people who wish to document the event, like the young man at the Allen event, to help the opposition. Allen had known this young man was there at the behest of Jim Webb, but he also understood that it was the right of this young man to document a public event held by a sitting United States Senator.

But, in this year’s race for governor, there have been at least two instances of Democrats either being harassed or thrown out of Jindal’s events, events that were free and open to the public, events that featured an elected Representative of the State of Louisiana, for simply attempting to document what was being said. It is important to note that other people were allowed to take photographs or videotape, and the media had been invited so that they too could document these events.

Five days ago, the Louisiana Democratic Party uploaded a series of three videos documenting a young woman who attended a public event in Lake Charles at Barney’s Police and Hunting Supply on April 5, 2007. This young woman had been somehow identified as a member of the Democratic Party. I do not know this young woman, but I am told that she is petite and that during this event, she was pushed, blockaded, and stepped on by NRA supporters at a public event featuring at least two elected officials, Bobby Jindal and David Vitter.

The footage is somewhat jumbled. At the 46 second mark of Volume One, the young woman whispers, “They pushed me into the guy behind me.” At 2 minute and 38 second mark, we hear another voice tell someone nearby, “You gotta move over, tiger. This young lady behind you can’t see.”

Volume 3 shows the comical efforts of these supporters to prevent this young woman from capturing any footage. Notice the way in which two people hold up clipboards in order to purposely block this young woman’s view. Such actions were meant to be intimidating, and much like the story of the LSU student removed from the Jindal rally (more on that later), this type of behavior should not be endorsed or tolerated by any candidate or elected official, regardless of their party affiliation.

Ironically, during this event, we hear Senator Vitter speak about our fundamental freedoms and “the core of our personal liberty as Americans.” I wonder whether Vitter, Jindal, or the NRA have the same passion for the First Amendment as they apparently have for the Second Amendment.

6 thoughts

  1. Greg, if you can provide evidence of a Republican (who was behaving peacefully and not attempting to attract attention to himself/herself) being accosted, harassed, and/or told to leave from an event held by an elected Democratic official, I will gladly publish it. And no, the roundtable discussion at YearlyKos in which an officer clearly violated military protocol by expressing political views while in uniform, does not apply for a few reasons:
    1. He attracted attention to himself. He was not a peaceful bystander.
    2. The event was not “public” and was not put on by any elected officials. I do not believe there was a single elected official at this roundtable. Wes Clark was there, but he is not an elected official.

    The footage of the student at the Kerry event also does not apply because, despite the fact that Kerry said he would answer the student’s questions, the student seemed a little histrionic and purposely attracted undue attention to himself, which disrupted the event. Also, no one would claim the kid was a Republican being harassed. He was asking Kerry why he conceded the 2004 election, despite the findings published by Greg Palast.

    Sure, there are idiots on both sides of the political aisle, but the phenomenon of squelching, intimidating, and harassing peaceful dissenters who simply seek to document the political process seems to be isolated to Republican events. Like Luke said, this is possibly due to the precedent established by President Bush.

  2. I watched these videos more than once and kept thinking that, from the brief glimpses, the “NRA Supporter” who is pushing the young lady around looks an awful lot like guy I went to school with named Blake Cooper. I googled his name and, sure enough, he is working for Bobby Jindal. An interesting “coincidence”.

  3. What are these Republicans afraid of? Democratic free thought? Underhanded tactics like these have a way of cementing opposition which will be far more powerful.

    I am a strong Democratic candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives in LA 01—the seat Jindal occupies and never did really want. 2 of my hardest workers are Republican and I am called daily for signs by Republicans. You better watch your step, Mr. Jindal, and quit making enemies.

  4. Lamar, I doubt they were Republican, but I do recall Democrats squelching free speech in outrageous proportions at the ’68 Demo. National Convention in Chicago, even to the extent of turning the micrphones and cameras off to a couple of state delegations. My point actually was that there are bad political tactics and even misinformation by both major parties, and that is wrong by whichever side commits it, even the Republican side.

  5. Expect more forms of censorship, disruption and intimidation from Jindal and his supporters. On the NOLA.com website Jindals ‘IT’ guys delete and ban most posts that criticize Jindal or point out glaring errors in his platform. This is very reminicent of the David Duke political rallies and interference with free speech.

Leave a comment